However, that being said, if you really want to run Ubuntu, and you really want it to be 32bit, you do have another option; install Ubuntu via the minimal install ISO. But i is becoming more of a purpose built architecture, similar to how in the past "embedded" devices label was applied.
Ubuntu website download pages have stopped advertising traditional i images for either desktop, server, or cloud, without any significant backslash and without any noticeable drops in the download rates.
How long will it take? I personally give it a year, tops. QUOTE: ……. Hence, their eagerness to remove the 32bit option. P S — Does this mean there will be no Ubuntu I checked with Linux Mint download page Mint is based on Ubuntu. The current release Linux Mint I use Linux from time to time, not extensively. Mint Mate Gnome and Cinnamon proved itself good enough for my tasks. A degenerate move by Ubuntu. In Linux, unfortunately Ubuntu clones are the easiest to use and also with so many apps.
They may not be able to install 64 bit OS. If the hardware continues to function, there will still be a demand for a bit version. This eliminates a low-cost OS replacement for Win 7 users on old hardware Pentium 4, old Celeron , when Win 7 end-of-support arrives in early Such a shame, just encountered this problem today.
I have been looking into replacing Windows XP with Linux as we have all heard over the years how much better it is supposed to be. Yes my machines might be a few years old but they are still perfectly decent except for XP support issues and more and more browsers no longer working on XP.
When you restart the system at the end of the installation, you will have a working Ubuntu desktop with the default desktop environment. Ubuntu Community Ask! Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.
Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. How to install Ubuntu Asked 3 years, 9 months ago. Active 1 year, 1 month ago. Viewed 3k times. Improve this question. Henry Wayat. Henry Wayat Henry Wayat 1 1 gold badge 3 3 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges. Note that this screenshots were taken at my Windows 10 desktop — Henry Wayat.
So what's your question? Please don't assume that your question is obvious. I don't see a question - reading the graffiti on a pic is difficult "people, who still hasr a need for smth good on16R That's" makes no sense.
If you are asking for help, please be considerate of those trying to help you make it easy for us. What makes you think you need netboot? Use a standard image. Download with bittorrent or any bit torrent client. Download the server image 32 bit , do a minimal install, boot to the command line, and then sudo apt install ubuntu-desktop — Panther.
Show 4 more comments. Active Oldest Votes. Desktop users paying close attention to Ubuntu may not like the renewed sense of focus and direction since much of the chatter, features, and tools coming out of Canonical right now are geared toward the server, container, and what the kids call the Internet of things IoT releases.
While it's true that's where Canonical's bottom line lies and without giving some attention to its paying customers there won't be a Canonical , that ignores the fact that Canonical put tremendous effort into transitioning away from Unity and building a replacement desktop out of GNOME. If Canonical really didn't care about the desktop, it wouldn't have put in any effort at all. It would have been much easier to just get rid of the desktop entirely, but that's not what happened. In a blog post announcing And if you're feeling boned by the lack of Unity in open source, you might want to hop onto the channel and join those who are updating Unity7 for the newest X and kernel graphics in That last bit hints at the future of desktop Ubuntu; so does a recent call for community input on a new Ubuntu desktop theme.
These messages point to a new Ubuntu desktop, one that's much more community-centric. Canonical got rid of most of its design team, so in one sense it has no choice but to farm these things out to the community.
But that's not the entire story here. This is pure conjecture on my part, but I think Canonical's course reversal on 'convergence' goes much deeper than just abandoning Unity. Canonical shows signs of also abandoning its sometimes rather rigid belief system as well. Gone are the days when feature requests were dismissed as 'won't fix' simply because they conflicted with some designer's vision of how the desktop should work.
Instead, I believe that Ubuntu realized its mistake wasn't just pursuing convergence, but that convergence wasn't what its users wanted. I believe that the new Canonical, the new Ubuntu, is going to listen more closely to its community. I also think that the desktop release will eventually be spun off as a community-driven product only loosely affiliated with Canonical.
Shuttleworth has already said Canonical is prepping for an IPO, hence the focus on money-making uses of Ubuntu embedded, server, etc. If that happens, the desktop will very likely slide to the side. In fact, it can be good. Keeping things separate allows the desktop to develop and grow largely independent of Canonical's bottom line. So The Unity desktop is gone, rather it's 'available in the archives,' which is to say it's gone for all but the diehard fans looking for an obscure cause to get behind.
Instead Ubuntu The first time you log in to Unfortunately, in some important ways, the similarities are only skin deep. Much of Unity's appeal was in the small things that greatly improved its usability relative GNOME, for example the keyboard-driven HUD, the global menu, the nice notification system, and several other innovations present in Unity are also 'available in the archives,' which is to say, they're gone.
How much this matters to your experience with Ubuntu Users who wish to remain with Unity are better advised to use Ubuntu
0コメント